Multiple sclerosis relapse after COVID-19 vaccination: A case report-based systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Concerns about vaccination increased among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) regarding side effects, efficacy, and disease exacerbation. Recently there were reports of MS relapses after the COVID-19 vaccination, which emerged the safety concerns. Therefore, we aimed to perform a systematic review of case reports and case series studies to investigate the MS relapses after COVID-19 vaccination with most details. METHODS: We systematically searched three databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, in February 2022. Case reports and case series which reported relapse after COVID-19 vaccination in MS patients were eligible to include in our study. RESULTS: Seven studies were included in our systematic review after the abstract and full-text screening with a total of 29 cases. The mean duration between COVID-19 vaccination and relapse appearance was 9.48 ± 7.29 days. Among patients, 22 cases experienced relapse after their first dosage of the COVID-19 vaccine, one after the second dose, and five after the booster dose. The type of vaccine was unknown for one patient. The most common symptoms of relapses were sensory deficits (paresthesia, numbness, dysesthesia, and hypoesthesia) and weakness. CONCLUSION: Overall, the COVID-19 vaccination may trigger relapses in some MS patients, but as the infection itself can stimulate relapse, the benefit of vaccination outweighs its risk in this population, and mass vaccination against COVID-19, especially in MS patients, should be continued and encouraged.

Efficacy and safety of favipiravir plus interferon-beta versus lopinavir/ritonavir plus interferon-beta in moderately ill patients with COVID-19: A randomized clinical trial.

Favipiravir (FVP), lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV), and interferon-beta (INF-beta) are considered as potential treatments for COVID-19. We examined the efficacy and safety of FVP and INF-beta compared to LPV/RTV and INF-beta combinations for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2. It was a single-center randomized clinical trial. Eligible patients were randomized to receive FVP plus INF-beta versus LPV/RTV plus INF-beta. The primary endpoint was the viral clearance after seven days of randomization. ICU admission, length of stay (LOS) in hospital, in-hospital mortality, and the incidence of adverse events were also measured. This trial was registered on the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20200506047323N3). Patients were randomly allocated to the FVP (n = 33) and LPV/RTV (n = 33) groups. The viral clearance on Day seven was not significantly different between the FVP (31.1%) and the LPV/RTV groups (16.1%). The rate of ICU admission and likewise the in-hospital mortality in the FVP group (12.5% and 6.3%, respectively) were similar to the LPV/RTV groups (19.4% and 19.4%, respectively). The median LOS in the hospital was also not different (6.8 days [interquartile range; IQR = 5.0-11.0] in the FVP and (8.0 days [IQR = 5.5-12.5]) in LPV/RTV groups (p = 0.140). Adverse events were observed in 25.0% of FVP and 32.3% of LPV/RTV groups. The combination therapy with FVP did not exert a higher efficacy compared to the combination regimen of LPV/RTV. However, both treatment regimens demonstrated a mild profile of adverse events.